• Users Online: 309
  • Print this page
  • Email this page

 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 147-149

Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among central retinal artery occlusion patients: A case series-HORA study report No. 3


Department of Ophthalmology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Department of Ophthalmology, Tung Wah Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong, China

Date of Submission30-Jan-2021
Date of Decision28-May-2021
Date of Acceptance07-Jun-2021
Date of Web Publication19-Jun-2021

Correspondence Address:
Sunny Chi Lik Au
Department of Ophthalmology, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital; Department of Ophthalmology, Tung Wah Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong
China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2221-6189.318644

Get Permissions

  Abstract 

Introduction: COVID-19 patients are susceptible to hypercoagulability, thromboembolic, and vasculitis state; central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) could be caused by hyperviscosity syndrome, thromboembolic accidents, and vasculitis. Evolving case reports are correlating CRAO with COVID-19 patients. Our case series aims to reveal the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among CRAO patients under the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: Medical records of all CRAO patients who attended our tertiary referral hospital, during COVID-19 local outbreak (March to November 2020), were reviewed. Respiratory tract samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by the validated Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay. If patients were able to cooperate, oropharyngeal saliva samples were obtained. Otherwise, nasopharyngeal and deep throat swabs were taken by registered nurses.
Results: A total of 15 CRAO patients (7 males, 8 females) were identified during the 9-month study period. The mean age was 72.1-years (range 45-88 year). None of the patients were infected by SARS-CoV-2 before their CRAO disease episodes. Three patients had a history of CRAO over the contralateral eye. No patient was diagnosed with COVID-19 up to their last follow-up (mean 255.4 days, range 152-341 days). Without any COVID-19 positive case, correlation statistical tests on SARS-CoV-2 infection and CRAO were not established.
Conclusions: Some of the presumed COVID-19 related CRAO cases may be just coincident with at-risk patients, as COVID-19 is prevalent across the world. More in-depth research, with adjustment to known confounding risk factors, is needed to establish a genuine correlation.

Keywords: COVID-19; Coronavirus; SARS-CoV-2; Retinal artery occlusion; Central retinal artery occlusion; Hyperbaric oxygen therapy


How to cite this article:
Au SC, Ko CK. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among central retinal artery occlusion patients: A case series-HORA study report No. 3 . J Acute Dis 2021;10:147-9

How to cite this URL:
Au SC, Ko CK. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among central retinal artery occlusion patients: A case series-HORA study report No. 3 . J Acute Dis [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 19];10:147-9. Available from: http://www.jadweb.org/text.asp?2021/10/4/147/318644

Significance

Association of COVID-19 and central retinal artery occlusion is evolving with more and more published case reports. Central retinal artery occlusion is a rare disease in the normal population. This case series reported the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among central retinal artery occlusion patients. Correlation of COVID-19 and central retinal artery occlusion is not established.




  1. Introduction Top


SARS-CoV-2 virus infection causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), in which multi-organ involvements were observed. COVID-19 patients are susceptible to hypercoagulability state, thromboembolic event, and vasculitis, therefore COVID-19 related cerebral stroke was widely reported[1]. There were evolving case reports published on central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), aka ocular stroke, in COVID-19 patients[2],[3],[4]. There seems to be a correlation between COVID-19 and CRAO. CRAO is a rare disease entity with an incidence of 0.85/100 000/year[5]. Our tertiary hospital is equipped with a hyperbaric oxygen therapy chamber, thus receives all locate acute CRAO referrals, serving >7 million population. Hyperbaric oxygen for central retinal artery occlusion study, in short, HORA study[6],[7], aims at evaluating the efficacy of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) for treating CRAO in Hong Kong, China[8]. To study the correlation between COVID-19 and CRAO, our retrospective study aims to reveal the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 among acute CRAO patients in the COVID-19 era.


  2. Patients and methods Top


2.1. Patients

Medical records of all CRAO patients referred to us during the local COVID-19 outbreak period (from March 1st, 2020 to November 30th, 2020) were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with a history of contralateral eye CRAO were also included in this case series. However, ophthalmic artery occlusion or internal carotid artery occlusion patients who presented with similar retinal ischemic findings were excluded. Patients were monthly followed up after completion of the first 5-day course of HBOT.

2.2. SARS-CoV-2 screening

Since the local COVID-19 outbreak, SARS-CoV-2 was screened for all CRAO patients receiving HBOT. This practice aimed to avoid SARS-CoV-2’s human-to-human transmission from asymptomatic viral carriers to others entering the same HBOT multi-place chamber simultaneously[9]. Patients could either provide oropharyngeal saliva samples if they were capable of performing the rinsing maneuver[10],[11],[12], or nasopharyngeal and deep throat swabs could be taken by our registered nurses[13],[14],[15]. Respiratory tract samples were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by the validated Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 assay[16],[17],[18],[19].

2.3. Ethical consideration

This study was approved by the Hospital Authority Hong Kong East Cluster Research Ethics Committee with the reference number HKECREC-2020-116.

2.4. Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were calculated with SPSS version 25 (IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY), normal distributions of data were tested before choosing the appropriate parametric or non-parametric statistical tests. Correlation analysis was done on SARS-CoV-2 positivity and CRAO, gender, age, and across the 2 groups of respiratory tract samples.


  3. Results Top


A total of 15 CRAO patients (7 males, 8 females) were identified from the retrospective review with a mean age of 72.1-year-old (range 45-88 years). No patient got a COVID-19 infection before the onset of CRAO. Among the 15 patients, oropharyngeal saliva samples were tested from 10 patients, whereas 5 patients were tested by nasopharyngeal and deep throat swabs. No patients got SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected by a reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. There was no loss to follow-up. The follow-up was the mean of 255.4 d (range 152-341 d), and none got COVID-19 infection. Furthermore, 3 patients had a history of CRAO over the contralateral eye before the index eye’s acute CRAO episode. However, none of the remaining 12 patients got subsequent contralateral eye CRAO upon their follow-up.

Among all CRAO cases, 9 (60.0%) got hypertension, 8 (53.3%) got hyperlipidaemia, whereas 4 (26.7%) of them got both hypertension and hyperlipidaemia. Without any COVID-19 positive case present in our CRAO case series, correlation by either parametric or non-parametric statistical tests on COVID-19 and CRAO or different types of respiratory tract samples were not established.


  4. Discussion Top


We searched via PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar with the search terms [“Retinal Artery Occlusion” OR “CRAO”] AND [“coronavirus” OR “COVID”] but only found few case reports[2],[3],[4]. Our study is a CRAO case series reporting on its prevalence of SARS-CoV-2.

Following our HORA study group’s first and second report[7],[8], this retrospective review of data serves as the HORA study report No. 3. Despite a negative result, HORA 3 is important to address the rising concern of CRAO in COVID-19 patients. Hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, coronary artery diseases, smoking, etc. are all well known metabolic risk factors for CRAO[5]. By reviewing other cases concerning COVID-19 and CRAO, it was not difficult to discover these middle-aged patients all had the risk factor of hypertension[2],[3],[4]. It could just be a coincidence that some studies reported CRAO patients with COVID-19 infection, and COVID-19-related thromboembolic tendency is not real etiology.

Given the weak correlation between COVID-19 and CRAO, practitioners could look to find more literature with concerns about COVID-19-related ocular findings by an ophthalmologist. There were few cases of CRAO as the ocular manifestations of COVID-19[20],[21],[22],[23]. The evidence on the correlation of CRAO and COVID-19 is rather weak, despite 9 months of COVID-19 pandemic with a billion infected cases. Our HORA study report No. 3 would add some values to future determinants on the correlation of CRAO with COVID-19.


  5. Study strengths and limitations Top


HORA study was primarily designed to assess the effectiveness of HBOT for acute CRAO in the urban city of Hong Kong, China[7],[8]. It receives territory-wide acute CRAO referrals from both the public and private healthcare systems round the clock, even under the local COVID-19 outbreak, serving the local population of >7 million. All patients continued their follow-ups within our study period. With the evolving issue on CRAO and COVID-19, we reviewed our pool of acute CRAO patients. Despite the efforts on this issue, the incidence of COVID-19 was 0 among our cases, thus further analysis on different correlations with statistical tests was not feasible. Being an important negative result study, HORA 3 supplemented the evidence gap currently available in the literature.


  6. Conclusions Top


In short, we believe some of the presumed COVID-19 related CRAO cases were just coincident with those at risk hypertensive patients amid COVID-19 pandemic. Further investigations are needed, especially over those COVID-19 patients without any metabolic diseases risk factor, to concrete the evidence on the correlation of CRAO with COVID-19.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Authors’ contributions

S.C.L.A.: Concept and design of study, acquisition of data, drafting the article; C.K.L.K.: Acquisition of data, revising the article for major intelligence.



 
  References Top

1.
Tan YK, Goh C, Leow AST, Tambyah PA, Ang A, Yap ES, et al. COVID-19 and ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-summary of the literature. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2020; 50(3): 587-595.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Acharya A, Diamond M, Anwar S, Glaser A, Tyagi P. Unique case of central retinal artery occlusion secondary to COVID-19 disease. IDCases 2020; 21: e00867  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Montesel A, Bucolo C, Mouvet V, Moret E, Eandi CM. Case report: Central retinal artery occlusion in a COVID-19 patient. Front Pharmacol 2020; 11: 588384.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Murchison AP, Sweid A, Dharia R, Theofanis TN, Tjoumakaris SI, Jabbour PM, et al. Monocular visual loss as the presenting symptom of COVID-19 infection. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2020; 201: 106440.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Grzybowski A, Kanclerz P. Preferred practice pattern for central retinal artery occlusion management. Surv Ophthalmol 2019; 64(4): 590.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Au SCL, Ko CKL. Comments on coronavirus positive patients presenting with stroke-like symptoms. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021; 30(7): 105741.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Au SCL, Ko CKL. Impact of COVID-19 on acute central retinal artery occlusion patient attendance in Hong Kong: The HORA study brief report number 2. Acta Sci Clin Case Rep 2021; 2: 1-2.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Yip LT, Au SCL, Ko CKL. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for central retinal artery occlusion: experience in Hong Kong. Hong Kong J Ophthalmol 2020; 24: 44-50.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Sunny CLA. Performing hyperbaric oxygen therapy for central retinal artery occlusion under COVID-19: From myringotomy to rapid viral test. Health Policy Technol 2020; 10(1): 29-30.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
To KK, Tsang OT, Leung WS, Tam AR, Wu TC, Lung DC, et al. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2020; 20(5): 565-574.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Chen JH, Yip CC, Poon RW, Chan KH, Cheng VC, Hung IFN, et al. Evaluating the use of posterior oropharyngeal saliva in a point-of-care assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. Emerg Microbes Infect 2020; 9(1): 1356-1359.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Wong SCY, Tse H, Siu HK, Kwong TS, Chu MY, Yau FYS, et al. Posterior oropharyngeal saliva for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71(11): 2939-2946.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Leung EC, Chow VC, Lee MK, Lai RW. Deep throat saliva as an alternative diagnostic specimen type for the detection of SARS-CoV-2. J Med Virol 2020; 71(11): 2939-2946.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Lai CKC, Chen Z, Lui G, Ling L, Li T, Wong MCS, et al. Prospective study comparing deep throat saliva with other respiratory tract specimens in the diagnosis of novel coronavirus disease 2019. J Infect Dis 2020; 222(10): 1612-1619.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Fakheran O, Dehghannejad M, Khademi A. Saliva as a diagnostic specimen for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in suspected patients: a scoping review. Infect Dis Poverty 2020; 9(1): 100.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Wolters F, van de Bovenkamp J, van den Bosch B, van den Brink S, Broeders M, Chung NH, et al. Multi-center evaluation of cepheid xpert® xpress SARS-CoV-2 point-of-care test during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. J Clin Virol 2020; 128: 104426.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Moran A, Beavis KG, Matushek SM, Ciaglia C, Francois N, Tesic V, et al. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 by use of the Cepheid xpert xpress SARS-CoV-2 and Roche cobas SARS-CoV-2 assays. J Clin Microbiol 2020; 58(8): e00772-20.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Goldenberger D, Leuzinger K, Sogaard KK, Gosert R, Roloff T, Naegele K, et al. Brief validation of the novel GeneXpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 PCR assay. J Virol Methods 2020; 284: 113925.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Hou H, Chen J, Wang Y, Lu Y, Zhu Y, Zhang B, et al. Multicenter Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Oropharyngeal Swab Specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2020; 58(8): e01288-20.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Pirraglia MP, Ceccarelli G, Cerini A, Visioli G, d’Ettorre G, Mastroianni CM, et al. Retinal involvement and ocular findings in COVID-19 pneumonia patients. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 17419.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Marinho PM, Marcos AAA, Romano AC, Nascimento H, Belfort R Jr. Retinal findings in patients with COVID-19. Lancet 2020; 395(10237): 1610.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Bertoli F, Veritti D, Danese C, Samassa F, Sarao V, Rassu N, et al. Ocular findings in COVID-19 patients: A review of direct manifestations and indirect effects on the eye. J Ophthalmol 2020; 2020: 4827304.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Ling XC, Kang EY, Lin JY, Chen HC, Lai CC, Ma DHK, et al. Ocular manifestation, comorbidities, and detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 from conjunctiva in coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 2020; 10(3): 153-166.  Back to cited text no. 23
    



This article has been cited by
1 The Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Protocol in Acute Central Retinal Artery Occlusion Seen within 24 Hours at a Tertiary Institution
Sunny Chi Lik Au
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases. 2021; : 106044
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Patients and ...
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Study strengt...
6. Conclusions
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed12611    
    Printed30    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded57    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal