|
| |
 |
|
| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2020 | Volume
: 9
| Issue : 6 | Page : 263-269 |
|
Risk factors of COVID-19 infection among policemen: A case-control study
Neeraj Agarwal, Bijit Biswas
Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India
| Date of Submission | 08-Jun-2020 |
| Date of Decision | 21-Sep-2020 |
| Date of Acceptance | 15-Oct-2020 |
| Date of Web Publication | 02-Nov-2020 |
Correspondence Address:
Bijit Biswas
Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
DOI: 10.4103/2221-6189.299182
Objective: To investigate the risk factors and protective measures of COVID-19 among policemen in an eastern state of India.
Methods: This case-control study was conducted in Bihar, located in the eastern part of India. In total, 6 confirmed COVID-19 cases (the case group) and 11 negative contacts of these cases (the control group) of Bihar Military Police participated in the study.
Results: All subjects were male with a median age of 51 (range: 23-60) years. Among these 6 confirmed cases, 5 cases were asymptomatic. One third (33.3%) of the case group and the majority (90.9%) of the control group reported maintenance of physical distance of at least 1 meter with others all the time, which was significantly different (P=0.028). There was no other statistically significant difference between the case group and the control group.
Conclusions: Physical distancing is the most effective public health measure to control contagious diseases like COVID-19, especially in the absence of an effective vaccine in police settings. Keywords: COVID-19; Police; Epidemiology; Risk factors; Protective factors
How to cite this article:
Agarwal N, Biswas B. Risk factors of COVID-19 infection among policemen: A case-control study. J Acute Dis 2020;9:263-9 |
| 1. Introduction | |  |
COVID-19 is a contagious disease and has caused an overwhelming burden of healthcare systems throughout the world[1]. As of 4:00 p.m., September 16, 2020, Indian standard time, about thirty million of COVID-19 cases and one million related deaths were reported from 213 different countries and territories[2]. Respiratory droplets and social contacts are major routes of transmission of the disease[3]. In the absence of an effective vaccine and treatment for COVID-19, most of the affected countries were forced to implement partial or full lockdown to minimize social contact and contain the virus[1],[4].
India is one of the leading countries suffering from COVID-19 pandemic. The country had implemented lockdown strategy at a very early stage of the pandemic except for healthcare, goods transport, media, law and order-related services with some restrictions[5]. Policemen are involved in law and order related services. During lockdown, they ensure people’s compliance with social distancing and mobility restriction in addition to their regular services[6]. Due to their job particularity, policemen are involved in more direct social interactions and are at higher risk of COVID-19 infection. With the spread of the pandemic and increasing relaxations of several services during the lockdown, policemen are becoming more susceptible to COVID-19 infection[7],[8]. Even a single infected policeman can pose a significant risk of infection among his/her colleagues and social contacts. Living in the same residential areas or barracks, sharing common toilets and transport vehicles, and food messes make the risk of infection higher among policemen[9],[10].
Located in the eastern part of India, Bihar has the third-highest population density in India[11]. Like other affected states, the Bihar government has deployed thousands of policemen to restrict social mobility, implement social distancing measures, and maintain law and order[12]. Recently COVID-19 cases have been reported among policemen of Bihar Military Police (BMP) in Patna district of Bihar[13]. It is worrying that except one all other confirmed cases were asymptomatic. Effective public health measures were needed to control COVID-19 infection in BMP. Thus, we undertook an epidemiological investigation among COVID-19 cases and their negative contacts in BMP till May 8, 2020, to explore the risk factors and protective factors for COVID-19 infection among them, and help to lay down effective control measures.
| 2. Subjects and methods | | |
2.1. Study design
This case-control study was conducted among COVID-19 patients and the negative contacts in BMP in Patna city, Bihar state.
2.2. Data collection
We interviewed the subjects telephonically using a structured schedule. Qualitative responses were documented, analyzed, and reported thematically. The structured schedule consisted of age, gender, years of service, comorbidity, addiction profile, living condition, social distancing practices, personal protective measure, personal hygiene, duty stations during lockdown, type of transport for commute, travel history during lockdown, sickness absenteeism in the preceding year (as a proxy indicator of their immunity) and self-reported anthropometric measurements like height, weight and waist circumference. All the study subjects were tested for COVID-19 using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test. Throat swabs for the real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction test were collected by a trained otolaryngologist[14].
2.3. Participants
On May 5, 2020, a sixty-year-old retired BMP policeman presented with fever and dry cough at the flu corner of All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Patna which was set for screening COVID-19. The policeman was symptomatic (fever and cough), and symptoms started from May 1, 2020. He initially went to Bihar Military Command Hospital (BMCH), Patna, seeking treatment. From there he was referred to AIIMS-Patna to be screened for COVID-19. Considering the symptoms and examination result met COVID-19 testing criteria, he was admitted to an isolation ward, and the throat swab sample was sent for testing. This policeman was retired from BMP service on March 31, 2020, but due to the nationwide lockdown, he could not go back to his native place and was forced to live in a BMP barrack along with other in-service policemen. On May 6, 2020, he was confirmed with positive result of COVID-19 test. Then 18 suspected high-risk contacts were quarantined and screened for COVID-19 on May 7, 2020. These 18 high-risk contacts consisted of 17 in-service BMP policemen and a doctor who initially examined the patient without adequate personal protective measures. On May 8, 2020, 6 out of 18 tested were reported to be COVID-19 positive, including the BMCH doctor. On 9th and 10th May 2020, we interviewed all quarantined BMP cases. Except for one negative case, the rest were interviewed telephonically. These 17 cases were divided into two groups: the case group with 6 COVID-19 cases and the control group with 11 negative contacts [Figure 1].
Some definitions used in the study are as following. Obese: Those who had BMI ≥25 kg/m2[15]. Centrally obese: Those who have reported their waist circumference >90 cm[16].
2.4. Ethical approval
Ethical approval of the Intuitional Ethics Committee of AIIMS-Patna (AIIMS/Pat/IEC/2020/476) was taken before drafting and submission of this manuscript. The consent was obtained from all participants and confidentiality was assured during data collection. The study was conducted as per the Declaration of Helsinki.
2.5. Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS (Chicago, USA) (version16). All descriptive data were expressed as median (IQR) and frequency (percentage). Bivariate analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test (for continuous variables) and Fishers Exact Test (for categorical variables). The minimum acceptable confidence level was a=0.95 for all statistics, and the significance difference was confirmed when was P<0.05.
| 3. Results | | |
Out of all participants, 9 (52.9%) [participants (P-1 to P-9)] resided in the same barrack and 4 (23.5%) (P-10 to P-13) resided in tents adjacent to the barrack. Others resided in different areas inside the same campus namely another barrack (P-14) (approximately 50 m away), storeroom (P-15) (approximately 100 m away), drivers barrack (P-16) (approximately 150 m away), and a family quarter (P-17) (approximately 800 m away). There were about ten public toilets and bathrooms (approximately 100 m away) shared by approximately 150 persons. There were three canteens for the residents inside the campus, along with a milk parlor. The floor area of the barrack of P-1to P-9 was approximately 525 square feet (ft) [length (L): 35 ft, width (W): 15 ft]. There were in total 5 windows (L: 4ft, W: 3ft) and 1 entrance door (L: 7ft. W: 4ft) in the barrack. The total space of door and windows was less than one-fifth of the floor space. So, there was a lack of ventilation. The approximate distance between beds inside the barrack was 1 m. The arrangement of beds of P-1 to P-9 inside the barrack with respect to the door and windows is depicted in [Figure 2].
All the study subjects were male with a median age of 51 (range: 23-60) years. Most of them were sergeant (47.1%) followed by officer (23.5%) and assistant sub-inspector (17.6%) with median years of service of 29 (range: 1-35) years. Considering their duty stations during the lockdown, 4 (23.5%) of them were deployed at various market places (i.e. vegetable market, fruit market, etc.). Three of them were deployed at government offices and police stations outside the campus. Among those who were assigned inside the campus, 3 (17.6%) were at armoury while 7 (41.2%) were at offices. Two-fifth (41.2%) of them used mass transport to commute while others walked to their duty stations as they were inside the BMP campus. None of them had taken sick leave in the preceding year while two of them had diabetes. Two-fifth of them (41.2%) were obese, while 52.9% of them had central obesity. More than half of them (58.8%) were addicted to Khaini (a kind of chewable tobacco). The majority of them (70.6%) maintained respiratory etiquette and physical distancing with others. The median frequency of daily handwashing with soap water and weekly frequency of cloth washing was 6 (IQR: 5-10) and 2 (IQR: 1-3) times respectively. At the same time, 70.6% of them reported alcohol-based sanitizer use after touching or handling objects with bare hands. All of them reported use of cloth masks while only half of them (58.8%) used both masks and gloves [Table 1] and [Table 2]. A total of 33.3% of cases and 90.9% of the controls reported maintenance of physical distancing of at least 1 m with others all the time. The difference was statistically significant between two groups (P=0.028). There was no significant difference in other variables between the case group and the control group [Table 3]. | Table 2: Key comments on various practices related to COVID-19 prevention and perceived source of infection.
Click here to view |
 | Table 3: Characteristics and COVID-19 status of the participants (n=17).
Click here to view |
| 4. Discussion | | |
This epidemiological investigation was conducted among BMP policemen quarantined for COVID-19. In the present study, all the six cases and three controls resided in the same barrack. These three controls maintained habits of physical distancing, frequent handwashing with soap-water or sanitization by alcohol-based hand rub, and use of cloth mask. These measures could protect people from infection. The other eight controls lived either in tents adjacent to the barrack or in a distant place. Thus, social distance is important for control of COVID-19 infection, which is in line with other studies[17],[18]. In the present study, the distance between beds is approximately one meter for P-1 to P-9, which is as per WHO recommendations on physical distance for COVID-19 infection prevention[19].
We found that those using both gloves and masks were at a lower risk of COVID-19 infection. Mask can block respiratory droplets while gloves prevent direct physical contact of hand. Both respiratory droplets and physical contact are major routes of COVID-19 transmission[3]. Currently, the WHO and the Center for Disease Control both recommend use of a face mask or cover, especially during a visit to a public place or social gathering[20],[21],[22]. Policemen are generally transported to their duty stations in groups of 30-35 by van or bus where keeping social distance with each other is merely impossible. In such circumstances, use of masks and gloves could lower the chance of COVID-19 transmission. In the present study, frequency of handwashing and sanitizer use were higher in controls compared with the positive cases. Handwashing and sanitizer use are important measures of prevention from contagious respiratory diseases like COVID-19[23],[24].
Although the difference in the incidence of obesity was not statistically significant between two groups in our study, other studies supported that those who were centrally obese were at higher risk of developing COVID-19 infection[25],[26]. Obesity, especially central obesity, increases the risk of metabolic disorders like diabetes[27], and it is reported that people with diabetes are more prone to COVID-19 infection[28]. Diabetes and other such chronic inflammatory metabolic disorders are determinant of disease severity and mortality of COVID-19 infection, and special attention should be paid to diabetics and even prediabetics patients[29]. In the present study, 58.8% of participants were addicted to Khaini, a chewable form of tobacco. Tobacco is an established risk factor for COVID-19 infection[30], and the effect of chewable tobacco is still needed to be studied further.
Regarding the source of infection, P-2 said that he got infected from P-1 who reported no travel history during the lockdown. Meanwhile, P-8 opined out that P-2 recently visited his native place in Buxar, which was the government notified active hotspot for COVID-19[31]. Although the date of the visit was not clear, we assumed that P-2 got infected during this visit and became an asymptomatic carrier. Later on, he might have infected his colleagues. There may be other possibilities, which need further in-depth investigation.
With regard to limitations, this was a case-control study that cannot establish a temporal association between COVID-19 infection and its various attributes. Secondly, all the data were self-reported by participants. Living conditions and COVID-19 related practices (i.e. physical distancing, hand washing, sanitizer use, mask use, etc.) were not observed. Their anthropometric indices were not measured either. So, there may be reporting and social-desirability related biases. Lastly, the study sample size was small. To conclude, maintaining physical distance is an effective measure to control contagious diseases like COVID-19, especially in the absence of an effective vaccine. Maintenance of physical distance along with other proven preventive measures like frequent hand washing and use of face cover or mask could significantly reduce the chance of COVID-19 infection among policemen.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflict of interest.
Authors’ contributions
All authors had full access to the data, contributed to the study, approved the final version for publication, and take responsibility for its accuracy and integrity. Concept or design: N.A.; Acquisition of data: B.B.; Analysis or interpretation of data: B.B.; Drafting of the manuscript: B.B.; Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: N.A., B.B.
| References | | |
| 1. | |
| 2. | |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | |
| 6. | |
| 7. | |
| 8. | |
| 9. | |
| 10. | Raghavan RK. The Indian police: Problems and prospects. Publius 2003; 33(4): 119-134.  |
| 11. | |
| 12. | |
| 13. | |
| 14. | World Health Organisation. Laboratory testing for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in suspected human cases: interim guidance. [Online] Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331329. [Accessed on 16 September 2020]. |
| 15. | Lim JU, Lee JH, Kim JS, Hwang YI, Kim TH, Lim SY, et al. Comparison of World Health Organization and Asia-Pacific body mass index classifications in COPD patients. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2017; 12: 2465-2475. |
| 16. | |
| 17. | Prem K, Liu Y, Russell TW, Kucharski AJ, Eggo RM, Davies N, et al. The effect of control strategies to reduce social mixing on outcomes of the COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan, China: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health 2020; 5(5): e261-e270. |
| 18. | Tuite AR, Fisman DN, Greer AL. Mathematical modelling of COVID-19 transmission and mitigation strategies in the population of Ontario, Canada. CMAJ 2020; 192(19): E497-E505. |
| 19. | |
| 20. | |
| 21. | |
| 22. | |
| 23. | |
| 24. | |
| 25. | Lighter J, Phillips M, Hochman S, Sterling S, Johnson D, Francois F, et al. Obesity in patients younger than 60 years is a risk factor for Covid-19 hospital admission. Clin Infect Dis 2020; 71(15): 896-897. |
| 26. | Simonnet A, Chetboun M, Poissy J, Raverdy V, Noulette J, Duhamel A, et al. High prevalence of obesity in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Obesity 2020; 28(7): 1195-1199. |
| 27. | Srikanthan K, Feyh A, Visweshwar H, Shapiro JI, Sodhi K. Systematic review of metabolic syndrome biomarkers: a panel for early detection, management, and risk stratification in the West Virginian population. Int J Med Sci 2016; 13(1): 25-38. |
| 28. | Fang L, Karakiulakis G, Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir Med 2020; 8(4): e21. |
| 29. | Marhl M, Grubelnik V, Magdic M, Markovic R. Diabetes and metabolic syndrome as risk factors for COVID-19. Diabetes Metab Syndr 2020; 14(4): 671-677. |
| 30. | |
| 31. | |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]
|
Search Pubmed for