• Users Online: 879
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2018  |  Volume : 7  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 74-77

Antimicrobial resistance pattern in ventilator—associated pneumonia in an intensive care unit of Babol, northern Iran


1 Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, I.R. Iran
2 Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, I.R. Iran

Date of Submission28-Mar-2018
Date of Decision15-Feb-2018
Date of Acceptance18-Feb-2018
Date of Web Publication31-May-2018

Correspondence Address:
Parviz Amri Maleh
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol
I.R. Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2221-6189.233015

Get Permissions

  Abstract 


Objective: To investigate antibiotic resistance pattern of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) generating microorganisms, and quantitative culture and determining antibiotic sensitivity. Methods: This cross sectional study was performed on 50 patients suffering from VAP in intensive care unit of Ayatollah Rouhani Hospital, Babol, Iran during 2014–2015. VAP was probable for them based on clinical signs and the criteria of Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score standards. Lower respiratory samples were given under bronchoalveolar lavage and quantitative culture was done on them. Afterwards by microdilution method, minimal inhibitory concentration based on respective microorganisms, considering clinical pulmonary infection score were determined. Results: From 50 investigated samples in this study, the most common microorganisms were Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) (70%) then Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12%), Staphylococcus aureus (8%) and Klebsiella pneumonia (3%). In our study A. baumannii showed approximate 100% resistance to all antibiotics, in a way that A. baumannii resistance to imipenem and meropenem and piperacillin/tazobactam each was 97.1%. The most resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was 66.7% to each cefepime and ceftazidime and clavulanate/ticarcillin. Staphylococcus aureus showed 75% resistance to nafcillin, cloxacillin and resistance in case of vancomycin was not seen. Conclusion: In current study, A. baumannii had the most prevalence among VAP and this species is resistant to most of antibiotics. Using ceftazidime, cefepime and clavulanate/ticarcillin, in treatment of the patients suffering VAP is not reasonable.

Keywords: Antibacterial resistant, Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Intensive care unit


How to cite this article:
Sadeghi-Haddad-Zavareh M, Jouybari HA, Javanian M, Shokri M, Bayani M, Roushan MH, Babazadeh A, Ebrahimpour S, Maleh PA. Antimicrobial resistance pattern in ventilator—associated pneumonia in an intensive care unit of Babol, northern Iran. J Acute Dis 2018;7:74-7

How to cite this URL:
Sadeghi-Haddad-Zavareh M, Jouybari HA, Javanian M, Shokri M, Bayani M, Roushan MH, Babazadeh A, Ebrahimpour S, Maleh PA. Antimicrobial resistance pattern in ventilator—associated pneumonia in an intensive care unit of Babol, northern Iran. J Acute Dis [serial online] 2018 [cited 2020 Jan 20];7:74-7. Available from: http://www.jadweb.org/text.asp?2018/7/2/74/233015




  1. Introduction Top


Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the most common infectious complications and the leading cause of death in intensive care units (ICUs)[1],[2]. VAP based on time event is divided into two types: early VAP that occurs within 4 d and late VAP which happens after the 5th day of hospitalization[3]. Risk factors of VAP include oropharyngeal colonization, trauma, surgery, imunosuppression, old age, urgent intubation, prolonged admission in ICU, sedative drugs steroids usage and previous hospitalization. Prevalent etiological agents in generating VAP in several studies consist of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Pseudomonas. aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) [4],[5]. Generally, etiological agents of VAP are different based on hospital or geographical position and their antibiotic resistance rates is also different among various areas[6]. The results of the different studies show that resistance rates of bacteria are increasing[7]. Increasing resistance to antibiotics raises the mortality rate, admission duration and expenses, in patients who suffer VAP in ICU. The mortality rate in VAP was reported 20%– 76% in different studies[8],[9].

In various studies of P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii in VAP the mortality of was 65% and 87% and for MRSA to was 84%[10].

In some study, using antibiotics of choice for treating VAP based on antibiotic resistance pattern in the same hospitals could decrease usage of inappropriate antibiotics and increase treatment success[11]. Considering that a study based on Bronchoscopy sampling method and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and quantitative culture performance and investigating microorganisms resistance with microdilution method and determining minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of antibiotic, has not been carried out so far in ICU of Ayatollah Rouhani Hospital of Babol (northern Iran), this study was done with the purpose of determining microorganisms involved in creating pneumonia from ventilation and their antibiotic resistance evaluation noticing method above.


  2. Materials and methods Top


This cross sectional study was conducted on 50 patients suffering ventilator associated pneumonia in ICU of Ayatollah Rouhani Hospital of Babol during the 2014–2015.

In this study with daily visit of hospitalized patients in Ayatollah Rouhani ICU, considering clinical criteria based on Clinical Pulmonary Infection Score (CPIS), patients who at least acquired six points based on CPIS and from the clinical signs, diagnosis of pnenumonia was possible for them, were under sampling method BAL and bronchoscopy[12]. The samples were cultured in blood agar and MacConkey agar, and culture media after 24–48 h incubation at (35±2) °C were evaluated. Samples were cultured under quantitative method and if growth of more than 104 CFU/mL bacteria were detected presumped as VAP etiological agents, in next step for determining sensitivity of microorganisms, Broth microdilution method was used. Ninety six part microplate which was applied in this method, has 12 columns that hole of the 11th column as negative control and the 12th column as positive control were used. In hole of the first group and the first hole of negative control, 200 mL of brain heart infusion (BHI) culture area of broth were poured and then in the rest of holes, 100 mL of BIH broth area were added. In the next step, antibiotic were added to the entire first column hole and the first hole of negative column and then based on standard method, suitable dilution of antibiotic in holes were prepared and after that diluted bacteria suspension to 0.1 and 5 mL of bacteria was added to holes except the negative control hole. Eventually, the final volume of all holes was 100 mL. The negative control was without bacteria and positive control was without antibiotic. Then micro plate were incubated in the temperature of 37 °C for 24 h. After 24 h micro plate were investigated under the light of the lamp and the last hole which turbidity wasn’t seen in it, was considered as MIC and by comparison with the table CLSI 20/3, resistance, semi-sensitivity or sensitivity of the bacteria relative to antibiotic was reported[13]. In this study, the investigated antibiotics for grampositive bacteria included nafcillin, cloxacillin, co-trimoxazole, cefazolin, vancomycin and the investigated antibiotics for gramnegative bacteria included ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, piperacillin/ tazobactam, gentamycin, amikacin, cefepime, clavulanate/ticarcillin, meropenem and imipenem.

All of the applied antibiotics in this recent study were produced and made by German company Merk and information yield from. All data were analyzed by SPSS software 16.


  3. Results Top


Of the 50 patients who suffer VAP in our study, 33 (66%) are male and 17 (34%) were female. The mean age of the patients was 67.43 year old. Among the patients 52% previously admitted in hospital and 60% had a history of antibiotic use in past 3 months [Table 1].the most common cause of admission of patients was neurologic disease (36%) and then respiratory disease. 12% of patients admitted with sepsis. And16%of patients was on stroid therapy. Demographic data of the patients are shown in [Table 1]. The most common microorganisms in our study were A. baumannii (70%), P. aeruginosa (12%), S. aureus (8%) and Klebsiella pneumonia (K. pneumonia) (6%). Meanwhile, from these 50 investigated samples, two samples (4%) did not grow in culture media.
Table 1: Resistance pattern of antibiotics in A. baumannii [n, (%)].

Click here to view


3.1. Evaluation of antibiotics resistance based on microdilution method in Acinetobacterbaumannii

Five antibiotics did not have any effect on 35 samples of A. baumannii in our study including that ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, amikacin, clavulanate/ticarcillin and cefepime. Meropenem, imipenem and piperacillin/tazobactam had 97.1% resistance respectively, and gentamycine had 94.3% resistance [Table 1].

3.2. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance based on micro dilution method in P. aeruginosa

In our study, the most resistance was related to ceftazidime, clavulanate/ticarcillin, cefepime, (each with 66.7% resistance) and the least resistance was related to imipenem (16.7%) and gentamycin (16.7%) [Table 2].
Table 2: Resistance pattern of antibiotics in P. aeruginosa [n, (%)]

Click here to view


3.3. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance based on microdilution method in K. pneumonia

Among the three samples of K. pneumonia in our study, the most resistance was related to ceftazidime, cefepime and clavulanate/ ticarcillin eaach with 100% of resistance. Gentamycin, meropenem, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam and ciprofloxacin each with 33.3% had the least resistance [Table 3].
Table 3: Resistance pattern of antibiotics in K. pneumonia[n, (%)].

Click here to view


3.4. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance based on microdilution method in S. aureus

Among the four samples of S. aureus in our study, resistance to cloxacillin and nafcillin was 75%. 25% of cases were sensitive to co-trimoxazole and no complete resistance to vancomycin was reported [Table 4].
Table 4: Resistance pattern of antibiotics in S. aureus [n, (%)].

Click here to view



  4. Discussion Top


Considering the extension of antibiotic resistance, early diagnosis of VAP and identification of the type of microorganisms and antibiotics resistance pattern, can modify the method of antibiotic prescription and as result decrease medication resistance. In our study the most common microorganisms of causing VAP were A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus that these results are similar to other studies[14],[15],[16].

The resistance rate of A. baumannii to carbapenemes like imipenem and meropenem in our study was 97.1% and in study done with Balkhy et al., in Saudi Arabia was 64.1% and in study of Salehifar et al., in Imam khomeili hospital of sari (Iran) was 100%[15],[16]. In current study, the resistance rate of P. aeruginosa to carbapenem as meropenem was 33.3% and to imipenem 16.7%, while the resistance rate to carbapenem was reported 14.7% in study of Jamaati et al, that was accomplished in Masih Daneshvari hospital of Tehran and it was reported 32.8% by Balkhy et al., in Saudi Arabia[16].

The resistance rate of S. aureus in our study to nafcillin and cloxacillin was 75% and it was reported 80%, 41.1%, 65.4% and 66.7% bysome studies[16],[17],[18]. One of the features of this study in comparison with many other studies, like the study was carried outby Aziz Japoni et al., in shiraz in 2008–2009 and Balkhy et al., study that was done in Saudi Arabia in 2004 to 2009 was related to sampling method that in our study bronchoscopy method and BAL were applied which were often more precise than ETA method[16],[19]. Also, in our study one of the characteristics was using CPIS and performing quantitative culture in order to positive consideration of BAL sample with colon of more than 104 cfu/mL[10],[20]. The value of quantitative culture was much more than qualitative culture for diagnosing and deciding to start the treatment of VAP.

The prevalence of A. baumannii in our study was 70% and it was reported by some studies 35.1%, 29% and 18% which shows that high prevalence of A. baumannii as a producing organism of VAP at our hospital relative to the other studies and can be a serious warning in outbreaks of hospital acquired infections caused by A. baumannii[15],[17].

The clear role of A. baumannii types among gram-negative microorganisms in hospital acquired infections like bacteremia, urinary tract infection, soft tissue infections and especially VAP and also high ability of these microorganisms in generating antibiotic resistance with various mechanisms, now a days is a major problem[21],[22]. Various studies about antibiotic resistance of A. baumannii was carried out which often they have reported high resistance of this microorganism[23],[24].

In many countries, in case of severe infections of A. baumannii. Use of carbapenems as a treatment choice is a rule but resistance toward them is also increasing[25],[26],[27].

The most common microorganisms involved in were A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa and S. aureus that among them A. baumannii was much more one and antibiotic resistance on all of the investigated antibiotics was about 100%. Noticing the results, high resistance of gram negative organisms to ceftazidime, cefepime and clavulanate/ticarcillin makes their use in empirical treatment of the VAP patients not appropriate.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Rea-Neto A, Youssef NCM, Tuche F, Brunkhorst F, Ranieri VM, Reinhart K, et al. Diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review of the literature. Crit Care 2008; 12(2): R56.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Shokri M, Ghasemian R, Bayani M, Maleh VA, Kamrani M, Sadeghi- Haddad-Zavareh M, et al. Serum and alveolar procalcitonin had a weak diagnostic value for ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with pulmonary infection score 6. Rom J Intern Med 2018; 56(1): 9-14.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Joseph NM, Sistla S, Dutta TK, Badhe AS, Parija SC. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: A review. Eur J Intern Med 2010; 21(5): 360-368.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Resende MM, Monteiro SG, Callegari B, Figueiredo PM, Monteiro CR, Monteiro-Neto V. Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in northern Brazil: An analytical descriptive prospective cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 2013; 13(1): 119.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Rello J, Ollendorf DA, Oster G, Vera-Llonch M, Bellm L, Redman R, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of ventilator-associated pneumonia in a large US database. Chest J 2002; 122(6): 2115-2121.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Koenig SM, Truwit JD. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Clin Microbiol Rev 2006; 19(4): 637-657.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Chi SY, Kim TO, Park CW, Yu JY, Lee B, Lee HS, et al. Bacterial pathogens of ventilator associated pneumonia in a tertiary referral hospital. Tuberc Respir Dis 2012; 73(1): 32-37.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Alp E, Voss A. Ventilator associated pneumonia and infection control. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2006; 5(1): 7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Banjar A, Felemban M, Dhafar K, Gazzaz Z, Al Harthi B, Baig M, et al. Surveillance of preventive measures for ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) and its rate in Makkah Region hospitals, Saudi Arabia. Turk J Med Sci 2017; 47(1): 211-216.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Chastre J, Fagon J-Y. Ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002; 165(7): 867-903.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Porzecanski I, Bowton DL. Diagnosis and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Chest J 2006; 130(2): 597-604.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Saensom D, Merchant A, Wara-aswapati N, Ruaisungnoen W, Pitiphat W. Oral health and ventilator-associated pneumonia among critically ill patients: A prospective study. Oral Dis 2016; 22(7): 709-714.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Yayan J, Ghebremedhin B, Rasche K. Antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa in pneumonia at a single university hospital center in germany over a 10-year period. PLos One 2015; 10(10): e0139836.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Jamaati HR, Malekmohammad M, Hashemian MR, Nayebi M, Basharzad N. Ventilator-associated pneumonia: Evaluation of etiology, microbiology and resistance patterns in a tertiary respiratory center. Tanaffos 2010; 9(1): 21-27.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Salehifar E, Abedi S, Mirzaei E, Kalhor S, Eslami G, Ala S, et al. Profile of microorganisms involved in nosocomial pneumonia and their antimicrobial resistance pattern in intensive care units of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Sari, 2011–2012. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2013.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Balkhy HH, El-Saed A, Maghraby R, Al-Dorzi HM, Khan R, Rishu AH, et al. Drug-resistant ventilator associated pneumonia in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. Ann Thorac Med 2014; 9(2): 104.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Rocha LdAd, Vilela CAP, Cezário RC, Almeida AB, Gontijo Filho P. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in an adult clinical-surgical intensive care unit of a Brazilian university hospital: incidence, risk factors, etiology, and antibiotic resistance. Braz J Infect Dis 2008; 12(1): 80-85.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Magazine R, Chogtu B, Rao S, Chawla K. Bacterial isolates from the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with pneumonia not responding to initial antimicrobial therapy. Sahel Med J 2013; 16(3): 102.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Japoni A, Vazin A, Davarpanah MA, Ardakani MA, Alborzi A, Japoni S, et al. Ventilator-associated pneumonia in Iranian intensive care units. J Infect Dev Countr 2011; 5(4): 286-293.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Sanchez-Nieto J, Torres A, Garcia-Cordoba F, El-Ebiary M, Carrillo A, Ruiz J, et al. Impact of invasive and noninvasive quantitative culture sampling on outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A pilot study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998; 157(2): 371-376.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Dijkshoorn L, Nemec A, Seifert H. An increasing threat in hospitals: multidrug-resistant A. baumannii. Nature Rev Microbiol 2007; 5(12): 939-951.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Schmier J, Hulme-Lowe C, Klenk J, Sulham K. Economic burden and healthcare resource utilization associated with multi-drug resistant A. baumannii: A structured review of the literature. J Pharma Care Health Sys 2016; 3(155): 2376-0419.1000155.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Mugnier PD, Poirel L, Naas T, Nordmann P. Worldwide dissemination of the blaOXA-23 carbapenemase gene of A. baumannii1. Emerg Infect Dis 2010; 16(1): 35.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Morovat T, Bahram F, Mohammad E, Setareh S, Mohamad Mehdi F. Distribution of different carbapenem resistant clones of A. baumannii in Tehran hospitals. New Microbiol 2009; 32(3): 265.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Dent LL, Marshall DR, Pratap S, Hulette RB. Multidrug resistant A. baumannii: A descriptive study in a city hospital. BMC Infect Dis 2010; 10(1): 196.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Taherikalani M, Etemadi G, Geliani KN, Fatollahzadeh B, Soroush S, Feizabadi MM. Emergence of multi and pan-drug resistance A. baumannii carrying blaOXA-type-carbapenemase genes among burn patients in Tehran, Iran. Saudi Med J 2008; 29(4): 623-624.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Higgins PG, Dammhayn C, Hackel M, Seifert H. Global spread of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 65(2): 233-238.  Back to cited text no. 27
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

  2. Materials and...
  In this article
Abstract
1. Introduction
3. Results
4. Discussion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1186    
    Printed68    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded208    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal